portable-HD-Camcorder: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game

Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
Apparently, Serious Sam and mocked him and seemed even ludicrous its own budget or something, but the best they can do is execute an abruptly xp system. It as well makes the hordes of enemies by shooting more enjoyable, I think. XP bonuses for head shots and kills quite a lot of, or not to let the villager who gives health to die or somewhat. The XP system should be executed in a way that is an absolute benefit in the game, but rewarding too.
Reply With Quote
#2
Old 21-11-2011
MACALL MACALL is offline
Member

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,244
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
Make Sam find out the force of arcane magic, give him armor with enlarged stats and damage, giving you new knacks to learn for every new level.
Reply With Quote
#3
Old 21-11-2011
Irene-I Irene-I is offline
Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,493
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
I do not like RPGs not want to see the series ruined SS with RPG elements. There are plenty of role-playing games to be played. Put SS RPG parts which would be like and gearbox 3Drealms they did to Duke in the abortion called DNF. A caricature and mockery of the franchise. We SS fans Croteam not want to spoil our game. No matter how "big" is the idea. Just look at Duke Nukem Forever and compare with the originals. That's a shame man.
Reply With Quote
#4
Old 21-11-2011
DougWison DougWison is offline
Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,456
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
In fact, I think the point of departure COD could be fun if you do this: Sam is attacked in a building by something beheaded. The screen starts to red at the edges and a box pops up saying "Press the [] button to get to cover." You press it, and ducks Sam something. Then he says: "Wait, what the hell I am doing?" then meets the eye with his gun and appears normal health meter.
Reply With Quote
#5
Old 21-11-2011
Ashley Parker Ashley Parker is offline
Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,421
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
Annoying the player to be fun is never fun. It's like those stupid [Genre Here] cinema, where they make fun of a scene by scene with the same actors from List B and a fart joke. Even if the original movie was really bad, why does other bad movie makes me feel better about it? This type of "parody" is just a waste of time the viewer / player, the best. I do not think there's any meaningful purpose to an XP system in a pure shooter, and Sam. It's an RPG on the abilities. A FPS is about the player's abilities: his real ability to play physical and mental health checks and to meet its objectives. A FPS player does not need a virtual "XP" when they are winning against real, real world experience while playing - increasingly lethal and not gameplay, but in reality.
Reply With Quote
#6
Old 21-11-2011
Shae Shae is offline
Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,599
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
That actually would be humorous as it comes in the phone booths are. It would only be fun as a former agreement, though. I memorize somewhat similar in "Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard", where Max complains near the start of the game engine at a standstill does not support a jump function.
Reply With Quote
#7
Old 21-11-2011
Wyl Wyl is offline
Member

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,478
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
I am usually open to new innovative ideas, but I have to scream a decisive NO in this case. Serious Sam is supposed to be one at the top, pull ridiculous, intense first person tried and true, are not that far from me and other fans Ss, please.
Reply With Quote
#8
Old 21-11-2011
Bubboy Bubboy is offline
Member

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,489
Re: Serious Sam 3: BFE must become a role-playing game
So you might have a different skin Border? Because this is really what will be a scam of the Border, and not serious Sam. I wonder why people are looking for the same type of game over and over again. We have one old-school shooter still on the market, why it is ruined? There are plenty of games of the same type, you really need one more?
Reply With Quote